Linkage

Overview and Terms

Terms

• Instant-centre (IC)
• Centre of Curvature (CC)
• Pedal bob
• Anti-squat
• Pedal kickback
• Anti-rise (brake jack)
• Axle-path
• Leverage curves
• Spring curves

Types of Linkage

Single Pivot

• Single Pivot: Description of the single pivot suspension system and a list of bikes that utilize this design.

Linkage-Driven Single Pivot

• Linkage-Driven Single Pivot: Explanation of the linkage-driven single pivot suspension system and a list of bikes that incorporate it.

Horst-Link (Four-Bar)

• Horst-Link (Four-Bar): Overview of the Horst-Link suspension design and examples of bikes equipped with it.

Twin-Link (Virtual Pivot Point)

• Twin-Link (Virtual Pivot Point): Details about the twin-link suspension system and its application in various bikes.

Trek's ABP

• Trek's ABP: Information about Trek's Active Braking Pivot technology and the bikes featuring it.

Yeti's Switch Infinity

• Yeti's Switch Infinity: Discussion about Yeti's Switch Infinity suspension platform and the bikes utilizing this technology.

High-Pivot

• High-Pivot: Explanation of high-pivot suspension systems and examples of bikes employing this design.

Ask AI

1. How do these different types of suspension linkages impact the performance of a mountain bike?
   1. The various types of suspension linkages outlined in the article have distinct impacts on the performance of a mountain bike. For instance, single pivot systems offer simplicity and efficiency in pedaling but may exhibit more pedal bob compared to linkage-driven single pivot or Horst-link designs. Horst-link (Four-Bar) setups are known for their balanced combination of pedaling efficiency and suspension activity under braking, making them popular for trail and all-mountain riding. Twin-link (Virtual Pivot Point) designs provide good small-bump sensitivity and mid-stroke support, often preferred for aggressive downhill riding. High-pivot suspension systems prioritize terrain absorption and traction, beneficial for tackling rough and steep descents.
2. Are there any notable advantages or disadvantages associated with each type of suspension linkage mentioned in the article?
   1. Each type of suspension linkage has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Single pivot systems are simple, lightweight, and cost-effective but may lack in suspension performance compared to more complex designs. Linkage-driven single pivot systems improve upon this by offering better control over suspension characteristics throughout the travel range. Horst-link (Four-Bar) setups excel in pedaling efficiency and traction but can be more complex and potentially heavier. Twin-link designs offer excellent suspension performance across a variety of conditions but may require more maintenance. High-pivot suspension systems provide unparalleled terrain absorption but can exhibit pedal kickback and require careful tuning.
3. Are there any specific riding styles or terrain types that certain suspension linkages are better suited for?
   1. The suitability of each suspension linkage type depends on various factors including riding style and terrain preferences. For riders who prioritize efficiency and versatility over diverse terrain, Horst-link and twin-link designs might be preferable due to their balanced performance characteristics. Single pivot systems could appeal to riders seeking simplicity and reliability, especially for less aggressive riding styles or budget-conscious setups. High-pivot suspension systems are often favored by downhill and enduro riders tackling extremely technical descents where traction and control are paramount, despite potential drawbacks in pedaling efficiency. Understanding these differences can help riders choose the most suitable suspension design for their specific needs and riding conditions.

External links

• The ultimate guide to mountain bike rear suspension systems